616.381-002.3+616-089.843-031:616.34-092.9
.. , .. , .. , O.A. ,
.. , ..

() (-)
» , , . 1530 , , . (pU < 0,05) . (pU = 0,046) , , , ..
, , » - , , , , , . , . , , . . , , », . , ,
15, 30 , , . ». . , .» , , , , , ..
: , ,
THE METHODS OF OPTIMIZATION OF INTESTINAL ANASTOMOSIS UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF EXPERIMENTAL PROLATE PURULENT PERITONITIS
V.P. Budasheyev, E.G. Grigoriev, S.A. Lepekhova, O.A. Goldberg,
E.N. Tsibikov, L.N. Kapsalikova
SC RRS ESSC SB RAMS, Irkutsk Buryat Branch of SC RRS ESSC SB RAMS, Ulan-Ude
Suggested combined uniseria! circular zigzag» intestinal stitch under the conditions of experimental prolate purulent peritonitis is one of safe variants of forming anastomosis on small intestine. In 1530 days of the research significant increase of mechanical strength (pU < 0,05) and physical containment (pU = 0,046) after using suggested, intestinal stitch compares double-row intestinal anastomosis is marked.
Technical methods for intestinal anastomosis defending under the conditions of experimental prolate purulent peritonitis with the help of antiseptic sponge algipor» and membrain drainage sorption composition, let to quicken healing of intestinal anastomosis and. improve the results of treatment of prolate purulent peritonitis. Given dynamics of morphological changes of inflammatory and. regeneration, has one type tissue nature at one and. double-row anastomosis. At double-row anastomosis there is more expressed, displacement of with layers of intestinal wall with roller» inverted, to intestinal gleam, the development of neogenic stromal frame in 15, 30 days of experiment is marked, the same as development of granulation tissue beetle into the gleam as pits. At using suggested, combined uniserial circular zigzag» intestinal stitch neogenic conjunctive tissue is less expressed, roller» is less expressed, too or is absent at all.
Key words: purulent peritonitis, intestinal anastomosis, experiment

() XXI . 300 000 . 15 25 % [4 6, 16]. -
4,3 69 % [10]. , - . 10 60 %, 90 % [2, 5, 15].
: , -
, ( , , ), , (, -, ) [3, 9].
, , - , [11, 13].
- , 8,8 % , 2,4 4,9 % [7, 14]. 0 19%, 42 % [7, 12]. [1, 2, 7, 8].
- .

96 2 3 12 25 . (.. 18-005304). , . , », 742 13.11.84 . -
» 48 23.01.85 . », 1964 ., 1975, 1983 1989 . , (- 0,04 / , - !1 2 % 2,0 1 + aminazini 2,5 %
2,0 1). 30 (3, 7, 15, 30 ) - ( , ) () . - 12 . , - ». » , -» () (. 1).
() ( = 24) - , 3- . 1 (-1) ( = 24) ». 2 (-2) ( = 24) . 3 (-3) ( = 24) », .

- , 3 5 .
1

n
24
-1 » 24
-2 24
-3 » 24
96
, .
. 1.
10 7, 5 , 2, 3 . 180°, : 4 5 5 - 4 . . 4 2, 3 10 . . . 5 6 . 7 . 7 . . .
-- 1015 . . » .
». , 0,51 . -» . 2.
: 30 , . , , , 100 300 , 2,0 0,5 % 510 . . , , . ( 3- ) 6 12 .
. 1. . 1 - (), 2 - , 3 - , 4 - , 5 - , 6 - (, ), 7 - .
. 2. - (). 1 - ; 2 - ; 3 - .
288 , 96 (. 2). , PRL TS 26 (Poland) 0 300 Hg.
.. . . , 95 % .

3, 4 5.
, -,
2

( )
3- 7- 15- 30- 3- 7- 15- 30-
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
-1 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
-2 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
-3 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36
3
,
, . .
3- 7- 15- 30-
85 (81-88) 96# (93-98) 125# (123-127) 300# (270-315)
-1 88 (85-91) 100# (95-105) 135* # (131-137) 350* # (325-375)
-2 86 (84-88) 97# (96-99) 127# (125-129) 352* # (318-375)
-3 86 (81-89) 102* # (100-103) 140* # (138-142) 400* # (370-420)
24 24 24 24
: * - , < 0,05, # - , < 0,05.
4


, . .
3- 7- 15- 30-
90 (86-94) 92 (89-94) 115 (112-117) 300 (280-310)
-1 92 (88-96) 98 (90-104) 120# (110-132) 320* # (312-328)
-2 92 (88-98) 93 (90-97) 117# (115-117) 320# (310-326)
-3 94 (89-99) 100* (96-116) 122* # (120-124) 350* # (335-360)
24 24 24 24
: * - , < 0,05, # - , < 0,05.
. . , , 3 ( < 0,05). 15- 30- , . 15- -1 -3 , ( < 0,05), , » » . , -
. 30- , .
(. 4) , 15- ( < 0,05). , 7- 15- -3, -
5

- , . .
3- , 3- , 30- , 30- ,
-1 92 (88-96) 88 (85-91) 320 (312-328) 350 (325-375)
-2 92 (88-98) 86 (84-88) 320 (310-326) 352 (318-375)
-3 94 (89-99) 86 (81-89) 350 (335-360) 400* (370-420)
24 24 24 24
: * - , = 0,046.
6
,
,
3- 7- 15- 30-
1,60 (1,38-1,82) 1,62 (1,56-1,66) 1,66 (1,42-1,86) 2,64# (2,54-2,70)
-1 1,72 (1,50-1,94) 1,70 (1,60-1,90) 1,76 (1,54-1,98) 2,80# (2,60-2,92)
-2 1,68 (1,46-1,90) 1,65 (1,55-1,72) 1,74 (1,52-1,96) 2,80# (2,70-2,86)
-3 1,82 (1,60-2,04) 2,20* (2,10-2,32) 2,52* (2,30-2,74) 3,0# * (2,8-3,2)
24 24 24 24
: * - , < 0,05; # - , < 0,05.
» . » . 30- -1 » , -3 , . -, » , , . - , , 5.
, 3- , , . 30- -3 ( = 0,046) » , ,
, .

3, 7, 15, 30- 6 7.
30- * V 8 1 6 4 6 V V 4 ( < 0,05). 7, 15 30- ( < 0,05) -3, , , » , .
( < 0,05) 30- . 7- ( < 0,05) -1, » -3, -
7


3- 7- 15- 30-
1,44 (1,22-1,64) 1,56 (1,47-1,62) 1,68 (1,46-1,90) 2,44# (2,34-2,52)
-1 1,47 (1,25-1,69) 1,70* (1,65-1,77) 1,78 (1,56-2,0) 2,60# (2,46-2,72)
-2 1,45 (1,23-1,67) 1,60 (1,50-1,71) 1,72 (1,50-1,94) 2,60# (2,50-2,68)
-3 1,62 (1,40-1,84) 2,0* (1,8-2,12) 2,22* (2,0-2,44) 2,80* # (2,68-2,89)
24 24 24 24
: * - , < 0,05; # - , , , < 0,05.
8

-
3- , 3- , 30- , 30- ,
1,60 (1,38-1,82) 1,44 (1,22-1,64) 2,64* (2,54-2,70) 2,44 (2,34-2,52)
-1 1,72 (1,50-1,94) 1,47 (1,25-1,69) 2,80 (2,60-2,92) 2,60 (2,46-2,72)
-2 1,68 (1,46-1,90) 1,45 (1,23-1,67) 2,80 (2,70-2,86) 2,60 (2,50-2,70)
-3 1,82 (1,60-2,04) 1,62 (1,40-1,84) 3,0 (2,8-3,2) 2,80 (2,68-2,89)
24 24 24 24
: * - , = 0,048.
» . -3 ( < 0,05), 15 30- , . , 30- 3 ( < 0,05). 8.
, » , 30- , , , , . 3- 30- ( > 0,05) , -
, .

3- , , . . . , , . . , . . 7- . . - », -
. , , -- . .
-, . , , . , , . , . . , 3- , , , .
15- . . . . . , (. 3).
30 -
. , .
, 3- , - , . - , . . » , - . », , - 15, 30- , , ». » , .

, 3 30 , » . -

. 3. . . , 15 . . . , 15 . 1 - ; 2 - . . -. . 10. . 10.
» 15 30- .
-» - .
. » , .

1. .. / .. , .. , .. // . 2004. 3. . 47 51.
2. .. / .. ,
A.. , .. . : , 2000. - 117 .
3. , -- - / .. . / / . - 2004. - 2. - . 53-56.
4. .. / .. , .. , .. . -.: , 2003. - 117 .
5. .. / .. ,
B.. , .. . - .: -, 2002. - 240 .
6. .. / .. // . . - 2006. - 2. - . 115-116.
7. .. . - / .. . - .: -, 2004. - 304 .
8. .. / .. , .. , .. // . - 2004. - 2. - . 2-6.
9. .. - / .. // . . -2006. - 2. - . 115-116.
10. / .. . // . . - 2004. - 7. - . 23- 26.
11. .. - / .. : . . . / . . .. , .. -. - .: -, 2003. - 148 .
12. .. / .. // . - 2001. - . 1, 1. - . 86-94.
13. .. / .. ,
.. , .. // . - 2002.
- 3. - . 38-41.
14. .. / .. // . . - 2004. - 3. - . 47-50.
15. Bartels H. The therapeutic results of programmed relaparotomy in diffuse peritonitis / H. Bartels, W. Barthlen, J.R. Siewert // Chirurg. - 1992. -Vol. 63, N 3. - P. 174- 180.
16. Berger D. Management of abdominal sepsis / D. Berger, K. Buttenschoen // Langen-becks Arch. Chir. - 1998. - Vol. 383, N 1. - P. 35-43.